OPS & Systems

Structuring product roles
at scale

Redesigning how PM, PD and PO work together - from overlapping roles to a complementary operating model

Context

When I joined Manutan, the Product Manager, Product Designer and Product Owner roles all existed - but without clear boundaries or handoff protocols. Each feature team operated differently, responsibilities overlapped, and the lack of a shared operating model was creating friction at every stage of delivery. The organization relied heavily on external contributors to compensate for internal misalignment.

15

people onboarded

Challenge

How do you redesign the way three distinct product roles work together - without imposing a theoretical framework that doesn't fit the culture, and without disrupting ongoing delivery?

3 roles

redesigned

My Role

Mandated by the Product Director to lead a full review of the product operating model. I audited existing workflows across all feature teams, redesigned roles, rituals, deliverables and handoff protocols from scratch, then led the onboarding of all three disciplines - PM, PD and PO - across the organization.

Adopted

by leadership

What I Did

01

Audit

Audited how each role was being practiced across feature teams - identifying overlaps, gaps and points of friction

02

Role redesign

Rewrote role definitions, responsibilities and boundaries for PM, PD and PO

03

Rituals & deliverables

Redesigned all rituals and deliverables in Jira and Figma to reflect the new model

04

Macro workflow

Built a macro workflow to make the operating model legible for non-product stakeholders

05

Onboarding

Ran onboarding sessions with all 15 people across the three disciplines

06

Leadership buy-in

Presented and secured buy-in from the Product Director and senior leadership

Operating model - macro workflow

Operating model macro workflow

Outcome

The new operating model was adopted across all feature teams. Role boundaries became clear, handoffs became consistent, and the complementarity between PM, PD and PO improved measurably. Leadership - who had previously struggled to distinguish between the three roles - validated the approach and used it as a reference for future hiring and team structuring. Reliance on external contributors decreased as internal teams gained in confidence and legitimacy.